At Hermès, One Trained Maker Assembles and Finishes Each Bag. Your Clinic Can Work That Way, Too.
Three everyday ways to give one signed-off person a whole piece of a patient’s day, with their name on it.
What you’ll take away
- The problem
- On a surgery day a patient can pass through five pairs of hands. Each person finishes a step, nobody owns the whole visit, and no one’s name is on it.
- What to remember
- Let one trained person carry a whole piece of work and put their name on it, once they have been signed off step by step.
- What to do differently
- Give each surgery patient one approved MA for the day, put her first name on the surgeon’s wound-care sheet, and sign new MAs off one step at a time.
When work passes through many hands, each person finishes a part and nobody owns the whole. Picture a Mohs surgery day. One person checks the patient in. Another rooms her, a third sets the tray, a fourth puts on the dressing, and a fifth goes over wound care on her way out. Every step gets done. But she has answered the same questions three times, and she goes home with a sheet that has no one’s name on it. The team feels it too: it is hard to take pride in a visit when all you held was one step. At Hermès, one trained maker assembles and finishes each bag, handle and all, and puts a personal mark on it, and nobody gets a whole bag until they have earned it in stages.
The learner says: “Who attaches the handle?”
The maker says: “I do. I put the whole bag together.”
One maker, the whole bag. From pieces already cut, she assembles and finishes the bag herself, down to attaching the handle.
The learner says: “How will they know it’s yours?”
The maker says: “My mark goes inside.”
Her mark goes on it. Each finished bag carries its maker’s hidden mark, so every bag can be identified.
The learner says: “When do I get a whole bag?”
The maker says: “Master this one first.”
The whole bag is earned. His own practice piece comes first: basics, then one model, then the workshop. Harder bags come only after that.
Hermès began in Paris in 1837, when Thierry Hermès opened a business selling made-to-measure harnesses.1 In 2024, CBS’s 60 Minutes reported that for a hundred years each of the house’s bags has been the work of a single craftsman, from start to finish.1 Guillaume de Seynes, a family member and executive vice president, said in 2025 that the house still gives every piece to a single person, “because this is where the artisanal aspect resides.”2 He also named the road the house turned down. Divide a bag into tasks, he said, and some people would do nothing but handles all day, others nothing but edges. Hermès has ruled that out for good.2 Harper’s Bazaar gives the credo in four words: “One craftsman, one bag.”3
One bag is a long piece of work for one person. Harper’s Bazaar put it at 15 to 20 hours of a craftsperson’s time. Catherine Fulconis, managing director of the house’s leather goods and saddlery division, told the magazine that the hours to “cut the leather, prepare everything” come on top of that.3 At Louviers in Normandy, Monocle reported, each workshop has its own cutting room next door. The cut pieces then go to one craftsperson, who assembles the item from start to finish.4 There, the cutting comes first; from then on, the bag is in one pair of hands.
Then the maker’s mark goes on it. CBS reported that artisans “sign” the bags they complete, and that the house authenticates a bag by its artisan’s hidden mark.1 De Seynes said each bag bears its maker’s personal mark, so any one of them can be identified.2 Some artisans who now work in the repair workshop, he said, have found themselves mending a bag they once made. He told a separate story, too. While his cousin Axel Dumas was giving a speech, a woman held up a rare violet crocodile bag in front of one of the artisans, who told her, “I think I made your bag.”2
Nobody starts with a whole bag. De Seynes describes the house school, L’École Hermès des savoir-faire, as an 18-month course that leads to the CAP, a French vocational diploma. The first six months go to the basic movements of leatherwork, the next six to a single model, usually the Kelly, and the last six to the workshop, where learners absorb its precise standard of quality.2 A writer on a 2019 workshop visit was told why the Kelly comes first: putting it together uses 99 percent of the house’s manufacturing techniques, and only once learners have perfected it are they given harder bags and trickier leathers.5 The right to carry a whole bag, and then the harder ones, is earned stage by stage.
What makes this demanding is that the parts depend on each other. A personal mark means something because one person assembled and finished the whole bag. A whole bag can go to one person because the course has already taken them through the basics, one model and the workshop’s standard. And because each bag is many hours of one person’s work,3 the house has to train people fully before it hands them one. The whole piece belongs to one trained person, and that person’s mark is on it.
Principles of Excellence
- One maker assembles and finishes the bag. One person assembles and finishes each bag, in de Seynes’s account and in reporters’ accounts, and the house has ruled out a line where some people do only handles and others only edges.1, 2, 3, 5
- The maker’s mark goes on it. Artisans “sign” each finished bag with a hidden personal mark. The house uses it to authenticate the bag, and de Seynes says it lets any bag be identified.1, 2
- The whole job is earned in stages. Basic gestures, then one model, then the workshop’s exact quality requirements, over 18 months. Harder bags and trickier leathers come only after the Kelly is perfected.2, 5
- Some steps come before the maker. At Louviers, Monocle reported, leather is cut in a room next to each workshop and then delivered to one craftsperson, who assembles the piece.4
3 Exceptional Practices for your Clinic
- Give each surgery patient one owner for the day. At Hermès, one artisan assembles and finishes the whole bag, and nobody does only handles all day. The person who carries the whole piece sees how every part fits, and the patient meets one face instead of five. On a Mohs day, the practice manager writes one approved medical assistant’s name beside each surgery patient on the assignment board. That MA greets the patient: “I’m Maya, your medical assistant today.” She rooms her, brings the site photo for the surgeon, sets the tray, checks on her between stages and walks her through the surgeon’s wound-care sheet before she leaves. The surgeon confirms the site with the patient, reads every stage and gives every result. If Maya has to step away, she hands over in person in a set order (patient, site and stage, what is pending, what was promised) and introduces her relief by name.
- Put the owner’s name on the finished work. Hermès artisans “sign” each finished bag with a hidden personal mark, and de Seynes says the mark means any bag can be identified. A name gives the maker credit and tells everyone whose work it is. At discharge after an excision, the MA who owned the visit walks the patient through the surgeon’s wound-care sheet and writes her first name in a box labeled “Your assistant today.” The surgeon stays named as the author of the instructions. The phone number beside her name is the clinic’s monitored line, which reaches the on-call clinician after hours, and the sheet says when to call 911. Her name goes on a sheet only after the supervising physician or nurse has approved her for that teaching, and it is there for credit, never for blame.
- Let people earn the whole visit, step by step. A Hermès learner masters basic gestures, then one model, usually the Kelly, before the workshop, and harder bags and trickier leathers wait until the Kelly is perfected. One core model first builds most of the skill before the hard cases arrive. When a new MA joins the surgical team, she starts by owning single-stage excision visits, and Mohs days with several stages come later. Her sign-off card has a line for each step of the visit: rooming, tray setup, dressing and wound-care teaching. A senior MA coaches her and records what she saw. The supervising physician or nurse gives final approval for each clinical task, within state scope and the clinic’s written delegation; until then, the new MA does it only under direct supervision. Her name goes on the board once every step is approved.
Explore the Evidence Further
Explore the Evidence Further. All 13 sources, with methods, findings and clinic applications
Thirteen sources, grouped by kind of evidence: accounts of how Hermès works, a hospital handoff study, reviews of continuity of care, the nearest dermatology trials, and one outside challenge to the house’s account. Each row gives the design and its main caution, the key finding, why it matters and a way to apply it. Study names link to the original sources, and the full references close this section. None of these sources studied a dermatology clinic, and none tested one named medical assistant carrying a procedure patient through the day, so every clinic example and application here is our illustration and proposal, not a tested intervention.
The Hermès practice: executive accounts and hosted visits
| Study or source | Setting, design and sample | Key finding | Why it matters | How to Apply It to Your Derm Clinic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBS News, 60 Minutes, “Hermès artistic director Pierre-Alexis Dumas on why a Birkin bag is ‘costly’ rather than ‘expensive’”1 | Broadcast report: CBS News, December 2024, built on access Hermès arranged. The production rule and company history are given in the reporter’s words; the report does not say which steps the single craftsman’s work includes or describe what the mark looks like. The workshop description is a visitor’s impression, not an audit of workload. Full article read for the research. | For a century, Hermès bags have been “made from start to finish by a single craftsman.” Artisans “sign” each bag once it is completed, and the house authenticates its bags by the artisan’s hidden mark. The house dates from 1837 in Paris, when Thierry Hermès opened a business selling made-to-measure harnesses. The reporter described the workshop as having “no looming clocks or quotas.” | It is the plainest outside statement of the one-maker rule and the maker’s mark. | Proposed: give one approved person a whole, named piece of the patient’s day, such as the MA steps of a surgery visit. |
| Maisey, “‘Scarcity is not a goal for us’: Hermes executive VP Guillaume de Seynes on secrets to the maison’s success”2 | Executive interview: The National, October 2025, an interview with Guillaume de Seynes, a family member and executive vice president, at a workshop opening the house hosted. The company’s own account, told to a journalist. The repair stories and the speech episode are secondhand, with no date, place or count, and the source does not say how the bag at the speech was recognized. Full article read for the research. | De Seynes said the house still gives every piece to a single person, because that is where the craft lives; splitting the work would leave people on handles or edges all day, and the house has ruled that out. Each bag bears a personal mark, he said, so any one of them can be identified. He told of artisans, now in the repair workshop, who have mended bags they once made. Separately, at a speech by Axel Dumas, a woman held up a rare violet crocodile bag and an artisan told her she thought she had made it. The school’s 18-month course is approved by France’s education ministry and leads to the CAP vocational diploma: six months of basic movements, six on a single model (usually the Kelly) and six in the workshop absorbing its precise standard of quality. Learners have a permanent job after 12 months, he said. The reporter wrote that the quality bar is strict while artisans organize their own working day. | It is the house’s own statement of the rule, the mark and the staged course. | Proposed: sign new MAs off step by step, and put a name on the finished work only after approval. |
| Chernikoff, “The Cultural Endurance Of The Mighty, Mighty Birkin”3 | Magazine feature: Harper’s Bazaar, March 2021 (the Singapore edition’s reprint of a US feature), relying on Catherine Fulconis, managing director of Hermès leather goods and saddlery. The 15 to 20 hours is the reporter’s figure; only the line about cutting time is Fulconis’s own, and the source does not say who does the cutting. Her words on quality are a statement of the house’s values. Full article read for the research. | The reporter put one bag at 15 to 20 hours of a craftsperson’s work, and Fulconis said the time to cut the leather and get everything ready comes on top. The magazine gives the credo “One craftsman, one bag” and glosses it as one craftsperson seeing each bag through, beginning to end; it does not say whether that includes the cutting Fulconis counts separately. Fulconis described a house that refuses to hurry and said quality guides it in everything. | It shows how much of one person’s time a single bag takes, and the reason the house gives. | Proposed: let the owner carry the visit from rooming to wound-care teaching, rather than splitting it into stations. |
| Monocle, “Hermès is at the forefront of a movement to uphold France’s leather-working traditions”4 | Magazine report of a hosted visit: Monocle, November 2023, on a visit Hermès hosted to its Louviers workshops in Normandy. One site. That cutting comes before the maker follows from the reported sequence; Monocle does not state it as the scope of the rule, and other reports describe one maker working from start to finish without separating cutting. Full article read for the research. | At Louviers, every workshop has a cutting room next door. The cut leather then goes to one craftsperson, who assembles the item from start to finish (“un homme un sac”). | Even in a one-maker workshop, one step comes before the maker, and the work then passes into one pair of hands. | Proposed: when the owner must change, hand over in a set order and introduce the new person by name. |
| Gualandris, “An Exclusive Look At The Incredible Craftsmanship Behind The Iconic Hermès Bags”5 | Hosted press visit: IGNANT, November 2019, an invited press visit to the Pantin workshop guided by a Hermès artisan. Full article read for the research. | One person makes each bag, “every aspect from start to finish.” The Kelly comes first because its assembly method covers 99% of manufacturing techniques, and learners are given harder bags and difficult leathers only once they have perfected it. | It shows the order of progress: one core model mastered before harder work. | Proposed: start a new MA on one straightforward visit type, such as single-stage excisions, before Mohs days. |
Handoffs: a multi-hospital before-and-after study
| Study or source | Setting, design and sample | Key finding | Why it matters | How to Apply It to Your Derm Clinic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starmer and colleagues, “Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program”6 | Prospective before-and-after study: 10,740 admissions in nine hospitals; resident physicians’ handoffs on inpatient pediatric units. Not randomized; unadjusted before-and-after rates as reported in the abstract, which was the depth read. It tested a standardized handoff program for residents, not medical assistants, dermatology or the removal of handoffs. | After the I-PASS handoff program, the medical-error rate fell 23% (24.5 to 18.8 per 100 admissions) and preventable adverse events fell 30% (4.7 to 3.3 per 100 admissions); six of the nine sites showed significant reductions. | Handoffs are a real point of risk, and a designed handoff was followed by fewer errors. | Proposed: when the owner must step away, hand over in a fixed order: patient, site and stage, what is pending, what was promised. |
Continuity of care: reviews in other settings
| Study or source | Setting, design and sample | Key finding | Why it matters | How to Apply It to Your Derm Clinic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pereira Gray and colleagues, “Continuity of care with doctors: a matter of life and death?”7 | Systematic review of observational studies: BMJ Open, 2018; 22 studies published from 1996 to 2017 in nine countries. Continuity between patient and doctor across visits, measured in different ways, so results could not be pooled. All observational: patients who keep the same doctor may differ in other ways. Not a single procedure day. Abstract read. | 18 of the 22 studies (81.8%) reported significantly lower mortality with greater continuity of care, with generalist and specialist doctors. | Continuity with one clinician over time is associated with lower mortality, in settings very different from a Mohs day. | Proposed: keep one person with the patient through the day where staffing allows. |
| Sandall and colleagues, “Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women” (2024 update)8 | Cochrane systematic review of randomized trials: 17 trials with 18,533 women, mostly at lower risk of complications, in the UK, Ireland, Australia, Canada and China; evidence to August 2022. Midwife continuity is a whole model of care (who leads, the philosophy of care, the setting), so its effects cannot be credited to continuity alone. The authors write that the mechanisms are undetermined and call for research on whether benefits come from “the continuity model, the philosophy of care, or the strength and quality of the relationship.” The 2016 version’s preterm-birth result is superseded. Abstract and discussion read in the full text. | Compared with other models of care, midwife continuity models likely reduce caesarean birth (16% to 15%) and instrumental birth (14% to 13%) and likely increase spontaneous vaginal birth (66% to 70%), all moderate certainty. Preterm birth may differ little or not at all (6% in both; low certainty), and the authors are very uncertain about fetal loss and neonatal death. Women’s reported experiences were generally more positive. | In randomized trials, a model of care built around one known carer showed small benefits, though continuity cannot be separated from the rest of the model. | Proposed: introduce the owner by name at the start of the visit, so the patient knows who is with her today. |
Nearest dermatology evidence: phone calls to Mohs patients
| Study or source | Setting, design and sample | Key finding | Why it matters | How to Apply It to Your Derm Clinic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sobanko and colleagues, “Preoperative telephone consultation does not decrease patient anxiety before Mohs micrographic surgery”9 | Randomized trial: One US academic center; 104 patients booked for same-day consultation and Mohs surgery, randomized to an educational phone call the week before or no call. Prior surgery and self-education were not controlled. It tested a call by the practice, not one assistant carrying the patient. Abstract read. | Both groups reported similar increased anxiety and high satisfaction; the call did not reduce anxiety or improve satisfaction. | It is one of the closest dermatology trials found, and it tested a single contact step, not a named owner. | Proposed: count what you can see: how many surgery patients had one named MA from rooming to discharge. |
| Taylor and colleagues, “A comparison of preoperative telephone call versus mailed educational materials on patient-reported outcomes in Mohs micrographic surgery”10 | Randomized comparison: One US center; 208 Mohs patients, all mailed an educational packet, about half randomly selected for an added phone call. Abstract read. | How prepared patients felt did not differ significantly between the groups, though fewer called patients were “somewhat” or “not satisfied” with the education (p = .013). | An added call did not change how prepared patients felt when they already had written materials. | Proposed: keep the written sheet clear and clinician-written, and have the owner walk the patient through it. |
| Vance and colleagues, “Effect of postoperative telephone calls on patient satisfaction and scar satisfaction after Mohs micrographic surgery”11 | Randomized single-blinded trial: One center; 104 Mohs patients, a postoperative call or none. Satisfaction scores were near the top of the scale, which leaves little room to detect change. Who made the call is not stated, and safety outcomes such as missed complications were not measured. Abstract read. | Satisfaction at suture removal was 4.90 with a call and 4.88 without (5-point scale, p = .80); scar scores did not differ significantly (3.37 vs 3.81, p = .31), and results were similar at three months. | Satisfaction was already near the top of the scale in this trial, with or without a call. | Proposed: name the clinic’s monitored line, not a person, as the route for questions after discharge. |
| Hafiji, Salmon and Hussain, “Patient satisfaction with post-operative telephone calls after Mohs micrographic surgery: a New Zealand and U.K. experience”12 | Prospective controlled study, not randomized: Two centers in New Zealand and the UK, June to September 2011; the operating surgeon called the study group on the evening of surgery. Not randomized; surgeon calls, not MA calls; satisfaction near the top of the scale. Abstract read. | The median rating of the follow-up service was 10 versus 9 on a 10-point scale, and 7% of control patients rang the surgeon with issues the call could readily have handled. More UK than New Zealand patients said a nurse-led call would satisfy them equally (94% vs 66%). | Some patients have questions after surgery that a planned contact could answer. | Proposed: tell every patient at discharge exactly where to call: the clinic’s monitored line on the surgeon’s sheet. |
A challenge to the account: a parliamentary allegation
| Study or source | Setting, design and sample | Key finding | Why it matters | How to Apply It to Your Derm Clinic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assemblée nationale, written question no. 13191, “Conditions de travail et pénibilité dans les ateliers de maroquinerie de luxe”13 | Parliamentary written question: Published 21 November 2023; tabled by an opposition deputy, Martine Etienne, citing an Alternatives Économiques article that the research did not open. An allegation, not an investigation or audit. Withdrawn on 11 June 2024 at the end of the mandate with no ministerial answer, and no company response appears in the record. Official page read in full. | It alleged that at Louis Vuitton and Hermès, leatherworkers are pressed to make goods quickly, with imposed cadences causing musculoskeletal disorders such as carpal tunnel syndrome and tendinitis. It also said management had divided production by task for speed, naming the two firms together, so that sentence cannot be assigned to Hermès specifically. | It is the one outside challenge to the house’s account of its workshops that the research found. It is unverified, and it sits against the executives’ refusal of stations and the visitors’ impressions without refuting them. | Proposed: watch MA workload when one person carries the whole visit, so ownership never turns into speed-up. |
Across all thirteen sources:
- None studied a dermatology clinic, and no study tested one named medical assistant carrying a procedure patient through the day.
- The Hermès account comes mostly from the house’s own executives and from visits it arranged, from 2019 to 2025. No independent audit of quality, defects or workshop conditions was found, and nothing here shows that the one-maker rule causes Hermès’s quality, profits or staff retention.
- Sources differ on whether cutting is part of the one maker’s job: most describe one maker working from start to finish, Monocle’s Louviers account places cutting in an adjoining room first, and Fulconis counts cutting hours separately without saying who cuts.
- The one outside challenge found, a 2023 parliamentary allegation about pace and strain, is unverified and names Hermès together with Louis Vuitton.
- The health care studies concern resident handoffs, doctor continuity across visits and midwife-led maternity care; the continuity evidence is observational or comes from bundled models of care.
- The handoff study, the continuity review and all four Mohs call studies were read as abstracts only. The Mohs call studies tested calls, not a named assistant.
Principles of Excellence: related evidence from other settings
The main text explains the Hermès practice in plain English. These sources describe it or study related ideas elsewhere; none measured whether the practice causes Hermès’s results.
| Point in the brief | Related evidence |
|---|---|
| One maker assembles and finishes the bag. | CBS’s report (broadcast report on a hosted visit).1 De Seynes on the rule and the refused stations (executive interview).2 Reporters’ start-to-finish accounts (hosted visits).3, 5 Visitors described no clocks or quotas and artisans managing their own days (hosted visits).1, 2 An unverified 2023 allegation of imposed pace and task division, naming Hermès with Louis Vuitton (parliamentary question).13 |
| The maker’s mark goes on it. | The signed bags and hidden mark (broadcast report).1 The personal mark, the repair stories and the speech episode (executive interview; secondhand).2 |
| The whole job is earned in stages. | The 18-month, three-stage course (executive interview).2 The Kelly first, harder bags after (hosted press visit).5 |
| Some steps come before the maker. | The Louviers cutting room and delivery to one craftsperson (magazine report of a hosted visit; one site).4 Cutting hours counted separately (magazine feature).3 A structured handoff program was followed by fewer errors (before-and-after study, resident physicians; abstract only).6 |
Our clinic suggestions: proposed, not tested
The three practices and today’s action are our suggestions for a dermatology practice, not a tested program. Every task stays within the MA’s scope under state law and the clinic’s written delegation, which each clinic must confirm for itself.
| Suggestion | What it draws on |
|---|---|
| One owner for the day: one approved MA named on the board for each Mohs patient, with the surgeon confirming the site and giving every result, and a set-order handover if she steps away. | The one-maker rule (executive interview; broadcast report).1, 2 A structured handoff program (before-and-after study in resident physicians, not MAs).6 Continuity of care in other settings (observational review; Cochrane review of a bundled maternity model).7, 8 The clinic scene is an illustration, not a documented case. |
| The owner’s name on the finished work: a “Your assistant today” box on the surgeon’s wound-care sheet, beside the clinic’s monitored line, after clinical approval. | The hidden personal mark (broadcast report; executive interview).1, 2 The Mohs call studies tested calls, not a named assistant (randomized trials and one non-randomized study; abstracts only).9, 10, 11, 12 |
| Earn the whole visit step by step: single-stage excisions first, a sign-off card, senior MA coaching, and the supervising physician or nurse giving final approval before independent work. | The three-stage course and the Kelly first (executive interview; hosted press visit).2, 5 No source tested a clinic sign-off ladder. |
| One action today: one already approved MA named for one surgery patient from rooming through wound-care teaching. | No study tested this one-day trial; it applies the same pattern with someone already approved for every step. |
Sources
- Alfonsi S, Chasan A, Karzis M, Kerbstat K. Hermès artistic director Pierre-Alexis Dumas on why a Birkin bag is “costly” rather than “expensive.” CBS News, 60 Minutes. 15 December 2024. cbsnews.com
- Maisey S. ‘Scarcity is not a goal for us’: Hermes executive VP Guillaume de Seynes on secrets to the maison’s success. The National. 14 October 2025. thenationalnews.com
- Chernikoff L. The Cultural Endurance Of The Mighty, Mighty Birkin. Harper’s Bazaar Singapore (originally Harper’s BAZAAR US). 29 March 2021. harpersbazaar.com.sg
- Monocle. Hermès is at the forefront of a movement to uphold France’s leather-working traditions (Maroquinerie de Louviers, Normandy). Monocle. 15 November 2023. monocle.com
- Gualandris D. An Exclusive Look At The Incredible Craftsmanship Behind The Iconic Hermès Bags. IGNANT. 5 November 2019. ignant.com
- Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R, et al. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(19):1803-1812. PMID 25372088. PubMed
- Pereira Gray DJ, Sidaway-Lee K, White E, Thorne A, Evans PH. Continuity of care with doctors: a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e021161. PMID 29959146. PubMed
- Sandall J, Fernandez Turienzo C, Devane D, Soltani H, Gillespie P, Gates S, Jones LV, Shennan AH, Rayment-Jones H. Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;4:CD004667. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub6. doi.org
- Sobanko JF, Da Silva D, Chiesa Fuxench ZC, et al. Preoperative telephone consultation does not decrease patient anxiety before Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):519-526. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.09.027. PubMed
- Taylor SL, Quan EY, Lockhart ERS, et al. A comparison of preoperative telephone call versus mailed educational materials on patient-reported outcomes in Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2024;50(4):337-340. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004086. PubMed
- Vance S, Fontecilla N, Samie FH, et al. Effect of postoperative telephone calls on patient satisfaction and scar satisfaction after Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(12):1459-1464. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001913. PubMed
- Hafiji J, Salmon P, Hussain W. Patient satisfaction with post-operative telephone calls after Mohs micrographic surgery: a New Zealand and U.K. experience. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(3):570-574. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11011.x. PubMed
- Assemblée nationale (16e législature). Question écrite n° 13191, Mme Martine Etienne: Conditions de travail et pénibilité dans les ateliers de maroquinerie de luxe. Journal officiel, 21 November 2023, p. 10450; withdrawn 11 June 2024. assemblee-nationale.fr